Laura HuberAZ State Senate · LD25
Proposals & Priorities

Priorities That Put People First

Arizonans are tired of politicians who campaign on generalities rather than solutions. Too many candidates speak in vague terms about the issues facing our state without offering any clear direction for how they might address them. That is why I have taken the time to research, consult, and develop proposals rather than simply listing problems. I want the people of Legislative District 25 to understand these as proposals and considerations for your review, not finished plans presented as certainties. I am sharing them because I believe the public deserves to see how I think and how I approach these challenges, and because I want your feedback to help refine and strengthen them. If elected, I intend to consult further with subject matter experts before implementing or modifying any of these ideas, so that they can be shaped to have the greatest positive impact while reducing any unforeseen negative consequences. As you decide who will represent you as your LD25 State Senator this November, I hope this gives you an honest picture of my approach and my willingness to listen and improve.

Accuracy matters. The statistics referenced throughout this page are drawn from verified public sources. Full citations are listed at the bottom of this page for reference.

Water Security

Water is the foundation of everything in Arizona, from the farms and ranches that feed our families to the homes, businesses, and jobs that sustain our communities, and the choices we make now will determine whether Arizona thrives for generations to come. To understand the scale of the challenge, it helps to know how water is measured. An acre foot is equal to 325,851 gallons, about enough to fill half an Olympic swimming pool, or to cover a football field, not counting the end zones, nearly one foot deep. In Arizona, one acre foot is typically enough water to serve three single family homes for a year, which means each home uses about one third of an acre foot annually. Our water shortage is not the result of Arizonans using too much water. In fact, Arizona has been a national leader in conservation: the state used approximately 7.1 million acre feet of fresh water in 1957 and 6.9 million acre feet in 2015, even as its population grew by almost six million people and its economy expanded by nearly 500 percent. Instead, the shortage is being driven by a hotter, drier climate and by a river that was overpromised from the start. The Southwest has now endured a megadrought for 26 years, since 2000, and research shows it is the driest such period since at least the year 800. Rising temperatures are shrinking the river itself: a U.S. Geological Survey study found that the Colorado River's flow has been decreasing by 9.3% for every degree Celsius of warming, as snow loss increases evaporation, and that warmer temperatures were behind about half of the river's 16% decline in flow from 2000 to 2017. Our water system was also built on projections that proved inaccurate: when the Colorado River Compact was approved in 1922, it was assumed that river flows would average 16.4 million acre feet per year, but actual flows from 1906 to 2024 averaged about 14.6 million acre feet and have averaged only 12.4 million since 2000. The result is a crisis that is already here. In August 2026, the Department of the Interior finalized new Colorado River rules as the combined contents of Lake Powell and Lake Mead fell to their lowest point since before Lake Powell began filling in 1963, and deliveries to the Lower Basin states will be reduced by 1.25 million acre feet in each of the next two years. Under the Lower Basin states' sharing agreement, Arizona's cut rises to 760,000 acre feet, a 48% increase over the current cut of 512,000 acre feet and roughly 27% of Arizona's total Colorado River supply. Our groundwater is under strain as well: in 2023, the Arizona Department of Water Resources projected that over 100 years, the Phoenix area would experience 4.86 million acre feet of unmet demand for groundwater, and even after a later update, the projection still showed 3.6 million acre feet of unmet demand. This matters to every family in the country, not only in Arizona: between November and April, 90% of the leafy greens and other vegetables for the United States and Canada come from the Yuma area. Arizona cannot solve this problem with the water already within its borders. Some groundwater is brackish, meaning it is too salty to drink until it is desalinated, and four brackish groundwater desalination projects proposed in 2017 could together provide 126,000 acre feet per year but have yet to be developed. The state is also looking beyond its borders: 75% of Arizona's long term water augmentation fund is reserved for projects that import water from outside the state, Arizona is evaluating desalination plants on the Gulf of California in Mexico, and long term demand for new water is projected at 1.5 million acre feet by 2060. These new supplies will make water unavoidably more expensive. Desalinated water may cost $2,500 to $5,000 per acre foot, which for a household supplied entirely by desalinated water could add $830 to $1,600 a year to its water bill, compared with about $270 per acre foot for Colorado River water in a 2020 study. If we do not act now, the consequences will be even more severe. The new federal framework allows Lower Basin shortages of up to 3.0 million acre feet a year, about 40% of the Lower Basin's legal entitlement, if conditions worsen. Without the agreement Arizona helped negotiate, federal managers could have imposed cuts of up to 77% on Arizona's Central Arizona Project supply, and if Lake Mead falls to 895 feet, it will reach 'dead pool,' where water can no longer flow downstream and Hoover Dam can no longer generate electricity. Desalination projects are not expected to be operational until 2031 at the earliest, so every year of delay makes the gap harder to close. At the same time, new demands are growing rapidly. The Phoenix metro area ranks second in North America for proposed data center development, and the average data center in APS's service territory needs as much energy as about 64,000 homes while operating near peak capacity 24 hours a day, which is why ordinary ratepayers must be protected from paying for infrastructure built for someone else. Investing in solutions pays off for everyone, as a national study found that every $1 million invested in water infrastructure generates $2.5 million in economic output and more than ten jobs. By conserving water, protecting our aquifers, developing responsible new supplies, and making sure large new users pay their fair share, we can protect Arizona families, farmers, and businesses while building a secure water and energy future for everyone.

  • Protect Arizona’s Colorado River water. I will support strong negotiations over the Colorado River’s future, responsible conservation, and policies that protect Arizona’s fair share of this critical water supply.
  • Expand water conservation. I will support practical conservation programs for cities, businesses, agriculture, and residents that reduce unnecessary water use while protecting Arizona’s economy and quality of life.
  • Protect and replenish groundwater. I will support stronger groundwater management, increased aquifer recharge, and policies that ensure we are not pumping groundwater faster than it can be replenished.
  • Give local communities the ability to protect their groundwater. I propose a statewide groundwater cap option that would allow a county or municipality to impose an annual groundwater withdrawal cap on a data center facility as a condition of a development agreement or permit.
  • Require new data centers to offset their groundwater use. New data centers should not use potable groundwater for cooling unless the operator demonstrates to the Arizona Department of Water Resources that it has secured a renewable water supply sufficient to offset its groundwater withdrawals on a gallon-for-gallon basis over the life of the facility. That water supply must be genuinely available and not already dedicated to another customer or purpose.
  • Make new development prove it has a sustainable water supply. Arizona should not continue approving growth without ensuring that adequate, reliable water is available for the people who will live and work there.
  • Expand water recycling and reuse. We should make greater use of advanced water treatment and wastewater recycling, including potable reuse where it can be demonstrated to be safe, reliable, and cost-effective.
  • Capture and recharge stormwater. Rather than allowing valuable rainwater and stormwater to run off or evaporate, Arizona should expand projects that capture stormwater and use it to replenish our aquifers.
  • Invest in agricultural water efficiency. Arizona farmers and ranchers are essential to our economy and food supply. I will support investments that help agriculture conserve water, improve irrigation efficiency, and maintain productive farmland.
  • Develop responsible new water supplies. Arizona should continue evaluating projects such as desalination, brackish groundwater treatment, groundwater recovery, and other augmentation projects. These projects should be evaluated based on sound science, environmental impacts, long-term reliability, and cost to Arizona taxpayers and water users.
  • Invest in rural water infrastructure. Rural communities should not be left behind. I will support funding for wells, pipelines, storage, treatment, conservation, recharge, and other infrastructure that helps rural Arizona secure reliable water supplies.
  • Support tribal water rights and water settlements. Arizona should continue working with tribal nations to resolve water-rights claims fairly and support the infrastructure necessary to make those settlements work.
  • Strengthen water infrastructure. We need to continue investing in aging water and wastewater systems, treatment facilities, storage, conservation projects, and other infrastructure that makes every drop go further.
  • Protect the reliability of our electric grid. Before a utility interconnects a new data center load, I propose requiring a Grid Capacity Certificate from the Arizona Corporation Commission confirming that the interconnection can be served without degrading reliability for existing residential and small business customers in that service area. The determination should be based on a cluster load impact study that evaluates the cumulative effect of large new loads.
  • Make large new energy users pay their fair share. I support a cost-causer-pays approach in which incremental infrastructure costs created specifically by a large customer, such as a data center, are recovered from that customer rather than spread across the general ratepayer base.
  • Require long-term commitments from major new loads. Data centers receiving major utility infrastructure investments should be subject to a minimum bill regardless of actual usage and a contract of at least ten years. Early termination fees should be sufficient to cover the customer's remaining share of infrastructure investments made specifically to serve that load.
  • Require customers to fund dedicated infrastructure. When transmission lines, substations, generation capacity, or other infrastructure are built specifically to serve a large customer's new load, that customer should be responsible for the associated incremental costs rather than shifting those costs onto ordinary ratepayers.
  • Protect residential and small business customers during emergencies. Large industrial and data center customers should be required to participate in demand-response or curtailment programs that allow utilities to reduce their load during system emergencies before residential or small business customers are asked to bear the burden of service reductions.
  • Make water and energy planning work together. Arizona's water and electric systems are interconnected. Large developments that consume significant amounts of both water and electricity should be evaluated for their cumulative impact on local resources and infrastructure before they are approved.
  • Use science and data to guide water policy. Arizona's water decisions should be based on the best available hydrology, climate science, groundwater data, and long-term projections rather than short-term political interests.
  • Plan for a hotter and drier future. Water policy must account for drought, declining reservoir levels, groundwater depletion, population growth, and the changing conditions Arizona is already experiencing.

Arizona's water future will not be secured by one project or one policy. It will take conservation, groundwater protection, agricultural efficiency, recycling, recharge, infrastructure investment, responsible development of new supplies, and thoughtful management of new growth. We need to make sure Arizona's economic growth strengthens our communities rather than asking existing residents to subsidize it with their water, electricity, and utility bills.

Education

A strong public school system is the foundation of a strong Arizona, preparing tomorrow's workforce, strengthening our communities, and giving every child a fair chance to succeed. Yet Arizona asks its schools to do more with less than almost any other state: according to the National Education Association's 2026 Rankings and Estimates report, Arizona spent $11,987 per student in the 2024 to 2025 school year, ranking 49th among the 50 states, while New York spent $32,370. Our teachers feel that gap every day, as Arizona's average teacher salary of $64,291 ranks 31st in the nation, and the consequences reach every classroom. A 2025 state survey found more than 4,200 teaching positions, about 7% of the state's total, filled by long term substitutes, student teachers, outside vendors or teachers covering extra classes during their own planning periods, with another 1,400 positions completely unfilled, and about 20% of Arizona's nearly 60,000 public school and charter teachers left their positions or switched schools during the 2024 to 2025 school year. Meanwhile, the ESA program has drifted far from its original purpose. It was created in 2011 for special education students and became universal in 2022, and since then, annual program costs have risen from roughly $175 million to about $1 billion. Much of that money now flows to families who were already able to afford private school: a 2024 legislative budget review found that roughly 70% to 80% of universal ESA participants previously attended private schools or were homeschooled, and an ABC15 analysis found that 52% of ESA participants live in the top quarter of ZIP codes with the highest incomes, with medians ranging from $81,000 to $178,000. A 2026 report found that 11.2% of students in high income ZIP codes are enrolled in the ESA program, compared with just 4% in low income ZIP codes. Oversight has not kept pace with that growth. Since late 2024, the Department of Education has automatically approved ESA purchases of $2,000 or less, and public records obtained by 12News showed taxpayer dollars going to 1 carat diamond rings, necklaces, appliances, gift cards, iPhones, big screen TVs, and hotel and resort stays, along with lingerie. Later records showed at least 18,000 ESA account holders, close to 20% of the program, used voucher funds on at least $10.3 million in banned purchases, and two people were convicted in a $110,000 ESA fraud case. Returning ESAs to their original purpose of serving students with disabilities would restore accountability, direct help to the families who need it most, and free resources for the needs our public schools face every day, including mental health support. According to the American School Counselor Association, Arizona had the nation’s highest student-to-school-counselor ratio in the 2024-25 school year, at 570 students per counselor. Research links smaller ratios to better standardized test performance, attendance, GPAs and graduation rates, along with fewer discipline infractions. Teaching children to recognize and report abuse protects them. As a Cochrane review of 24 trials found that school based prevention programs improved children's protective behaviors and knowledge, may increase the odds that abuse is disclosed, and did not increase children's anxiety or fear. Nourishing students helps them learn and behave well, since a 2026 study found that adopting universal free meals decreased suspensions by approximately 10% for elementary students and 6% for middle and high school students. When we pay teachers what they are worth, fill every classroom with a qualified educator, and invest in counselors, safe and honest education, healthy meals, and the public schools that serve the vast majority of Arizona's children, we build safer schools, healthier kids, a stronger workforce, and a brighter future for every community in our state.

  • Raise teacher salaries. I propose increasing teacher salaries so that Arizona can recruit and keep the qualified, experienced educators our children deserve.
  • Fill every classroom with a qualified teacher. I propose providing incentives to fill the more than 4,200 teaching positions currently covered by long term substitutes and temporary staff, as well as the 1,400 positions that remain completely unfilled.
  • Increase per pupil spending. Arizona ranks 49th among the 50 states in per student spending. I propose increasing Arizona's per pupil spending to New York's level over the next five years.
  • Return ESAs to their original purpose. I propose we limit Empowerment Scholarship Accounts (ESA) exclusively to Arizona students with disabilities who qualify for special education or related services, while eliminating universal ESA eligibility.
  • Give every student access to a school counselor. I propose requiring each school district to work toward a student to counselor ratio of 250 to 1, the American School Counselor Association's recommended standard since 1965, over the next five years.
  • I propose we repeal or substantially revise the restrictions on school materials enacted through HB 2439 and HB 2495, including the provisions currently codified in A.R.S. §15-120.03, as well as codify protections against book bans in school districts and public libraries.
  • Provide medically accurate, age appropriate health education. I propose requiring medically accurate, age appropriate instruction from kindergarten through 12th grade on anatomy, reproduction, contraception, sexually transmitted infections, consent, abuse, and how and to whom to report abuse. I also propose repealing Arizona Administrative Code R7-2-303 and amending A.R.S. §§ 15-102, 15-711, and 15-716 to replace the statewide opt-in requirement with an opt-out option and to remove the prohibition on instruction before fifth grade.
  • I propose that every public school student be provided with free, nutritious breakfast and lunch made primarily from locally sourced Arizona ingredients, while strengthening Arizona’s existing restrictions on ultraprocessed foods in schools.

Healthcare

Every Arizonan deserves health care that is affordable, timely, and focused on patients rather than paperwork, and fixing our insurance system benefits patients, doctors, employers, and taxpayers alike. Insurance red tape is causing real harm: in a 2025 national survey of 1,000 physicians, 95% said prior authorization delays access to necessary care, 79% reported that patients abandon treatment because of authorization challenges, and 26% said it had led to a serious adverse event, including hospitalization, permanent impairment, or death. Costs are also keeping people from the care they need, as about four in ten U.S. adults say they have not taken their medication as prescribed in the past year due to costs, and the share of adults going without mental health care because of cost has steadily increased in recent years. Controlling hospital prices works: after Rhode Island capped hospital price growth, hospital prices fell an average of 9 percent relative to comparison states, and fully insured premiums were $1,000 lower per member by 2022 than they would have been without the cap. Covering hearing and vision care is an investment in healthy aging, since a leading international commission identified hearing loss and untreated vision loss among the modifiable risk factors for dementia, with hearing loss accounting for 7% of potentially preventable cases. When insurers pay providers fairly and on time, patients can see the provider they choose, prescriptions are affordable, and care is based on medical need rather than bureaucracy, every Arizonan benefits from a healthier, more productive, and more secure community.

  • I propose an any willing provider requirement in which an insurer (insurance company) must accept any state-licensed provider who agrees to the insurer’s standard participation terms, modeled after Kentucky law upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Kentucky Association of Health Plans versus Miller (2003), including a requirement that insurers publicly post and contemporaneously update provider reimbursement rates.
  • I propose reform to claims payment timing and recoupment, so that the clean claim payment deadline in ARS 20-3102 be shortened from 30 days to 10 days with interest penalties for late payment, reduce insurer recoupment of previously paid claims from one year to 30 days except in cases of fraud, and require insurers to provide written justification and appeal opportunity before recoupment.
  • I propose establishment of a Prescription Drug Affordability Board with authority to review drug prices and set upper payment limits for state-regulated plans and AHCCCS, modeled after programs already in use in Colorado, Maryland, Oregon, and Maine.
  • I propose we increase minors' access to care by codifying a minor’s ability to consent to contraceptive services and outpatient mental health treatment without parental consent from the age of 12.
  • I propose insurers be required to cover fertility treatment, medications, medical supplies, fertility preservation services, storage of eggs, sperm, and embryos in all plans.
  • I propose insurers be required to cover hearing, vision, and dental services in all plans.
  • I propose that we require insurers to meet defined call answer time and live agent availability standards, enforceable by the Arizona Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions through market conduct-exams and provider and public reporting.
  • I propose we require insurers provide coverage parity for telephonic medical or mental health services, and close telehealth loopholes by prohibiting insurers from requiring providers to deliver in-person care as a condition of network participation, prohibiting insurers from reducing a provider’s reimbursement rate if they do not provide in-person services, and prohibiting insurers from paying providers a higher rate, bonus, or additional compensation for in-person care.
  • I propose further privacy protection by codifying that insurers may not require full progress or psychotherapy notes as a condition of paying a claim or for any other reason. Insurer requests are limited to the minimum necessary personal health information to adjudicate the claim.
  • I propose a ban on prior authorization entirely for inpatient and outpatient mental health and substance use disorder treatment, modeled directly on Illinois’s Healthcare Protection Act and its 2025 extension. For all other services, require a ‘Gold Card Exemption’ for any provider with a prior authorization approval rate of 90% or higher over six months, exempting that provider from prior authorization for that service going forward. This proposed six-month standard is informed by the Texas Gold Card model.
  • I propose hospital and insurer price transparency requiring the launch of a statewide hospital price comparison tool (like Nevada’s Hospital Price Finder.)
  • I propose hospital price growth caps. Research on Rhode Island’s broader health-care affordability standards found that the program was associated with a 2.7% reduction in total health spending growth.
  • I propose expanding and strengthening Arizona's pharmacist test-and-treat authority, including allowing pharmacists to order and interpret tests waived by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (a federal program ensuring that patient test results are accurate, reliable, and timely), such as rapid strep and flu tests, pregnancy tests, and blood glucose meters, as well as initiate treatment for additional specified conditions.

Environmental Protection

Arizona's open spaces, wildlife, and clean air are part of what makes our state home, and protecting them strengthens our economy, our health, and our quality of life. Arizona voters understood this in 1990, when the Heritage Fund passed with over 62% of the vote, yet in 2010 the Legislature repealed the State Parks portion of the fund and swept its remaining money into the general fund, and thirteen state parks were closed in the immediate aftermath. Protecting these dollars is also smart economics, because the outdoor recreation industry generated about 111,000 Arizona jobs in 2023, about 3.4% of our total employment. Wildlife crossings protect both drivers and animals, and Arizona has already proven they work: a fencing project linking three existing crossing structures on State Route 260 reduced elk vehicle collisions by 98 percent over a six year span. Clean air is just as essential, and today the Phoenix Mesa metro area ranks 4th worst in the nation for ozone pollution, with Maricopa County averaging 58.2 unhealthy days per year, while 1,376,206 kids in Arizona are breathing unhealthy levels of air pollution. The same report ranks the Phoenix area 15th nationally for the worst year round particle pollution, the kind of pollution that dust control efforts help reduce. When we protect conservation funding, connect our trails and wildlife corridors, and reduce vehicle emissions and dust, we create safer roads, cleaner air, a stronger outdoor economy, and an Arizona our children and grandchildren can enjoy.

  • I propose monies deposited into the Heritage Fund under existing statute shall be used exclusively for land conservation, state park capital improvement and maintenance, wildlife habitat protection, and public trail development and maintenance. It may not be transferred, swept, or redirected to the general fund or any other purpose by any subsequent legislative act absent the same three-fourths vote and purpose-furthering requirement applicable to constitutionally protected voter initiatives.
  • I propose expanding the State Land Department's use of conservation leases under existing law, prioritizing parcels identified by Game and Fish as high value habitat or by State Parks as connecting existing trail systems. Since leases are sold at fair market value, our schools and other trust beneficiaries continue to receive full revenue, and I would fund the leases through dedicated conservation dollars.
  • I propose the Arizona Department of Transportation, in consultation with Arizona Game and Fish, shall identify priority wildlife movement corridors that intersect state highways, using existing Game and Fish habitat connectivity data. A new highway construction or major reconstruction project intersecting a priority corridor shall include a wildlife crossing structure, such as an overpass, underpass, or fencing system directing animals to a safe crossing point.
  • I propose the Legislature appropriate funding to a Trail Connectivity Fund, administered jointly by Arizona State Parks and the State Land Department to acquire easements or conservation leases connecting fragmented segments of Arizona’s state trail system, including the Arizona Trail.
  • I propose the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality shall adopt vehicle emissions standards for new vehicles registered at least as stringent as the most current California Air Resources Board standards.
  • I propose the Legislature appropriate funding to a Dust Mitigation Grant Program, administered by Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), to help counties and municipalities in nonattainment areas pave unpaved roads, stabilize disturbed soil at construction and demo sites, and monitor particulate hot spots. A nonattainment area is a geographic region that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has officially designated as failing to meet federal National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for one or more pollutants most commonly ground-level ozone or particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10).

Corrections, Rehabilitation, and Reentry

What happens inside our prisons and jails directly affects the safety of every neighborhood, because at least 95% of all state prisoners will be released from prison at some point and return to our communities. Right now, too many return without the tools to succeed. A Bureau of Justice Statistics study found that about 66% of people released from state prisons in 2008 were arrested within three years. The good news is that proven programs change these outcomes. The largest study of its kind, conducted by the RAND Corporation, found that incarcerated people who participate in education programs have 43 percent lower odds of returning to prison, and that every $1 invested in prison education reduces incarceration costs by $4 to $5 in the first three years after release. Counseling grounded in cognitive behavioral therapy works as well: a major review of 58 studies found that it reduced recidivism by 25%, and the most effective programs cut it by more than half. Restorative justice benefits both sides of a crime, because a systematic review of randomized trials found that victims who participate express higher satisfaction, receive more sincere apologies, and suffer less from post traumatic stress symptoms, while the programs produced 3.7 to 8.1 times more benefit in crimes prevented than they cost to deliver. Safer housing, independent oversight, and mental health support for the officers who work in these facilities strengthen every one of these efforts by creating an environment where rehabilitation can actually take place. Arizona's own Department of Corrections has set a goal to decrease its three year recidivism rate by 10% by June 2029, and my proposals give the department the evidence based tools to meet and exceed that goal. When we invest in rehabilitation, we prevent future victims, reduce the cost of reincarceration for taxpayers, and help people return home ready to work, support their families, and contribute to their communities.

  • I propose the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation, and Reentry (ADCRR) shall house individuals under 25 years of age separately from individuals over that age, absent documented safety reasons, ADCRR shall classify individuals by offense severity and criminal history, shall house lower-level offenders separately from those with a current or prior high-severity offense classification, and every housing unit shall provide private shower facilities and sleeping arrangements designed to protect individual safety.
  • I propose ADCRR and each county jail system shall employ at minimum one licensed professional mental health counselor for every 40 incarcerated individuals and that each counselor’s caseload shall not exceed 40 incarcerated individuals. Each counselor must hold full licensure as a professional counselor, clinical social worker, or equivalent credential recognized by the Arizona Board of Behavioral Health Examiners (AZBBHE) and must have competency in substance abuse treatment and trauma treatment as a condition of employment. Every incarcerated individual shall receive a minimum of one individual therapy session, 45 to 60 minutes in length, per week with an assigned licensed clinician, addressing the individual’s specific treatment needs.
  • I propose ADCRR establish a voluntary restorative justice program allowing an incarcerated individual to engage in a structured amends process with a willing victim or victim surrogate, facilitated by a trained restorative justice practitioner.
  • I propose every facility shall provide mandatory programming at minimum one hour weekly addressing racial reconciliation and disengagement from gang affiliation.
  • I propose every incarcerated individual shall participate in at least two hours of weekly group counseling addressing at minimum: emotion regulation, distress tolerance, interpersonal effectiveness, and mindfulness, drawing on established Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) frameworks. Group curriculum shall additionally cover at minimum two hours weekly of financial literacy, budgeting, banking, credit, and tax-filing obligations, job market preparation, resume building, and interview skills.
  • I propose every incarcerated individual who has not completed a high school equivalency credential shall be enrolled in a GED prep program, and literacy instruction shall be available for any individual who cannot read or write at a functional level.
  • I propose strengthening and expanding the Independent Correctional Oversight Office, including giving it authority to conduct regular and unannounced inspections of every state and county correctional facility for contraband, including drugs and drug paraphernalia, as well as compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
  • I propose requiring the Arizona Department of Corrections to have a licensed professional counselor on staff at every facility from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., dedicated solely to correctional officers and jail staff and separate from any counselor serving inmates, available for staff to book individual consultations, given that correctional officers experience PTSD at rates between 19 and 34 percent, compared to roughly 6.8 percent in the general population, and face a suicide rate estimated at seven times the general population rate. This staff only counselor would also provide critical incident debriefing and coping support for staff following violent or traumatic incidents on the job, and would regularly present coping strategies and mental health information at staff meetings for all personnel, consistent with the trauma informed staff training and education the National Commission on Correctional Health Care's 2026 standards already call for.

Social Media & Data Privacy

Every Arizonan deserves control over what they see online and what companies do with their personal information, and our children deserve protection from platforms designed to keep them scrolling. The U.S. Surgeon General warned in 2023 that adolescents who spent more than 3 hours per day on social media faced double the risk of experiencing poor mental health outcomes including symptoms of depression and anxiety, while teens spend an average of 3.5 hours a day on social media. The constant pull of notifications makes it worse: a Common Sense Media study found that teens received a median of 237 notifications on a typical day, with about a quarter arriving during the school day and 5% at night, and nearly 1 in 3 adolescents report using screens until midnight or later. Parents across the political spectrum share these concerns, as about nine in ten Americans are concerned about social media sites knowing personal information about children, and 85% are concerned about advertisers using data about children's online activities to target ads to them. Adults want protection too: 81% of Americans say they are concerned with how companies use the data they collect about them, and 73% feel they have very little or no control over it. Giving every Arizonan a simple way to turn off the algorithm and a single signal to stop the sale of their data puts people, not tech companies, back in charge of their own lives, while protecting our children's mental health, sleep, and privacy.

  • I propose restricting personalized social media feeds and nighttime notifications for minors modeled after New York’s SAFE for Kids Act and that Arizona mirror New York’s Child Data Protection Act restricting data collection, sale, and targeted advertising directed at minors.
  • I propose every Arizonan, not just kids, have a clearly visible option to turn off personalized algorithmic recommendations and choose a non-profiled feed, such as a chronological feed, without the platform switching the user back without consent. This proposal is modeled in part on Article 38 of the European Union’s Digital Services Act.
  • I propose every Arizonan have the right to tell a company to stop selling their data, with one signal instead of fighting it account by account and that companies must honor the universal opt-out signal, such as the Global Privacy Control, transmitted through consumer’s browser or device without requiring separate account by account requests.

Labor and Workers' Rights

When workers are treated fairly, paid transparently, and free to speak up without fear, the benefits reach every family, business, and community in our state. Pay transparency helps ensure people are paid fairly for their work, and a study published by the American Economic Association found that salary disclosure laws in Canada reduced the gender pay gap between men and women by approximately 20 to 40 percent. The freedom to organize matters because it raises living standards: in 2025, union members had median weekly earnings of $1,404, compared with $1,174 for nonunion workers. Yet in Arizona, workers represented by unions made up only an estimated 4.5 percent of wage and salary workers, compared with 11.2 percent nationwide, and our public employees have limited options, since under current Arizona law, public employers may not engage in binding collective bargaining and may only agree to meet and confer with employees or their representatives. Workers also deserve the freedom to make their own decisions without pressure, and when researchers at Cornell University studied union elections in which employers ran opposition campaigns, they found that 85% of employers forced workers to attend mandatory meetings during work hours and 36% surveilled workers using cameras, social media, phones and key cards. As artificial intelligence and monitoring technology spread, clear protections are essential, because the American Psychological Association found that 56% of workers who are monitored on the job report feeling tense or stressed during the workday, compared with about 40% of those who are not. Fair pay, a real voice at work, and respect for privacy lead to healthier workers, stronger families, and more stable businesses, and I believe every Arizonan deserves to be treated with dignity and fairness on the job.

  • I propose we require every business, nonprofit, and contractor operating in Arizona to publicly disclose all employee and contractor compensation.
  • I propose a business entering into a contract with the State of Arizona shall remain neutral regarding any union organizing effort among its employees performing work under contract.
  • I propose all state, county, and municipal employees, excluding law enforcement and firefighting personnel already covered by a separate statute, have the right to form, join, and participate in labor organizations of their own choosing and to engage in collective bargaining through representatives of their own choosing regarding wages, hours, and terms of employment.
  • I propose if an employer holds a meeting or communication primarily concerning the employer’s views on religious, political, or labor organization matters, including decision to join or support union organization, that employer must permit an employee to decline to attend or leave without penalty and must provide notice of the right at the time the meeting or communication is announced.
  • I propose artificial intelligence surveillance protections, including: 1) a written advanced notice requirement of 30 days before an employer may implement electronic monitoring or an automated decision system, 2) prohibited methods - emotion recognition system, gait recognition to infer condition, pregnancy, or disability, 3) prohibition of collecting a biometric identifier without the worker’s prior written consent, 4) prohibiting monitoring of a worker’s personal device or account, and 5) prohibition of monitoring a worker during unpaid break time or outside scheduled working hours.

Generating Needed Revenue for Arizona

Taxes are how Arizonans pool resources to build the things no family or business can build alone, and the research is clear that these investments pay off for all of us, not only for the people who use a service directly. Education is a prime example, because as workers' educational attainment rises, their unemployment rates decrease and their earnings increase, which means a stronger workforce, more successful local businesses, and a broader tax base. Access to health care saves lives, and a landmark study published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics found that expanding Medicaid coverage led to a 9.4 percent reduction in annual mortality among low income adults ages 55 to 64, driven by fewer deaths from disease. Public safety protects every household, and our investment in firefighters, fire prevention, and building codes has made a measurable difference: the number of reported home fires and home fire deaths has been cut in half since 1980, while police officers and emergency crews stand ready to protect our families, homes, and businesses every day. Our roads carry commuters, school buses, ambulances, and the goods that stock our stores, and neglecting them is costly, since a 2020 analysis found that roads and bridges that are deteriorated, congested, or lacking safety features cost Arizona motorists $9.6 billion a year in vehicle repairs, delays, and crashes. Water is the foundation of our farms, homes, and economy, and a national study found that every $1 million invested in water infrastructure generates $2.5 million in economic output and more than ten jobs. When we invest wisely in schools, health care, safety, roads, and water, we build a community where families are healthier, neighborhoods are safer, businesses can grow, and opportunity reaches everyone. I believe every tax dollar should be spent carefully and transparently on services that make a real difference in people's lives, and that is the standard I hold myself to every day.

  • I propose an increase to the state sales/transaction privilege tax by 0.5 percentage point.
  • I propose a luxury/high-end consumption tax imposing an additional 5% tax on the portion of qualifying luxury purchases above specified thresholds: vehicles, boats, or private aircraft over $100k, and jewelry, watches, or purses over $25k.
  • I propose an additional 5% tax on corporate taxable income above $5 million.
  • I propose increasing Arizona’s minimum corporate tax for corporations operating in Arizona with more than $500,000 in annual gross revenue.
  • I propose taxing all Arizona commercial sportsbook operators at a flat 51 percent rate on their revenue, regardless of size, matching the rate New York currently charges commercial mobile sportsbook operators. This goes further than Governor Hobbs' fiscal year 2027 budget proposal, which called for a tiered structure raising the rate to 45 percent only for operators averaging more than 75 million dollars a month in revenue, while leaving smaller operators at the current 10 percent online and 8 percent retail rates. Tribal gaming operators would continue to operate under their existing tribal state gaming compacts, consistent with how New York's law does not apply its 51 percent commercial rate to that state's tribal gaming facilities.
  • I propose replacing Arizona's flat income tax with a graduated tax system, returning to the structure Arizona used before 2021. The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy has estimated that fully reversing the flat tax could generate approximately 2.6 billion dollars a year in additional state revenue.
  • I propose limiting Arizona's property tax exemption for religious organizations to property used or held primarily for religious worship only, reversing Senate Bill 1298, which expanded the exemption to also cover property used for education, housing, and other religious related activities. This would return the exemption to the standard Arizona Revised Statutes Section 42-11109 used before that expansion, and I would also require regular audits of existing exemptions to confirm the property claiming the exemption is genuinely used for worship and not for commercial purposes, rental income, or held vacant for future use.
  • I propose raising Arizona's severance tax on metalliferous mining, currently set at 2.5 percent of the value of extracted minerals such as copper under Arizona Revised Statutes Section 42-5202, to 3 percent.
  • I propose closing Arizona's sales tax exemptions and corporate tax loopholes, including exemptions currently applied to purchases such as private jet timeshares and fine art, along with other sales tax exemptions that have been enacted for large corporations over time.

Equal Rights

Equality under the law is not a special privilege for some; it is a foundation that strengthens families, businesses, and communities for everyone. The Equal Rights Amendment states a simple principle, guaranteeing equality of rights under the law for all persons regardless of sex, yet Arizona has never ratified it, and the question of whether the amendment is officially part of the U.S. Constitution remains unresolved. Arizona can add its voice by ratifying it. The need is real: in 2025, women in Arizona made about 82 cents for every dollar men made. When women are paid fairly, entire families benefit, and research from the Institute for Women's Policy Research found that if women were paid the same as equally qualified men, poverty for working women would be reduced by more than 40 percent, adding $541 billion in wage and salary income to the U.S. economy. The same is true for fairness across race and ethnicity. A Citi report found that if four key racial gaps for Black Americans in wages, education, housing, and investment had been closed 20 years ago, $16 trillion could have been added to the U.S. economy, and that closing them today could add $5 trillion over the next five years. Discrimination holds back not only the people it targets, but every business that loses talented workers and customers, and every community that loses the full contributions of its neighbors. I believe that protecting the rights and dignity of every person, regardless of gender, race, or ethnicity, is both a moral commitment and a smart investment in Arizona's future.

  • I propose a state constitutional amendment establishing that equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the State of Arizona on account of sex, race, or ethnicity, covering healthcare, reproductive care, employment, compensation, education, and property rights, enforceable through Arizona courts. I would pursue this both through renewed legislative ratification of the federal Equal Rights Amendment, which Arizona's Legislature has repeatedly blocked from a floor vote since 2019, and through a citizen initiative placing the amendment directly before Arizona voters, following the same path voters used to add reproductive rights protections to the Arizona Constitution through Proposition 139 in 2024.
  • I propose strengthening and expanding the Arizona Civil Rights Act to explicitly prohibit any business or corporation operating in Arizona from discriminating on the basis of sex, race, or ethnicity in employment, compensation, healthcare access, and other covered areas, ensuring that the equal treatment standard established by the constitutional amendment applies to private employers and companies, not just government action.
  • I propose creating a state paid family and medical leave insurance program, since Arizona currently only guarantees paid sick time through Proposition 206 and offers no dedicated paid leave for childbirth, adoption, or caring for a seriously ill family member, building on Senate Bill 1464, which was introduced to establish such a program with up to 26 weeks of paid leave in qualifying circumstances.
  • I propose requiring Arizona employers to disclose salary ranges to job applicants and prohibiting employers from asking about or relying on a candidate's salary history during hiring, closing gaps in Arizona's current Equal Pay Law that allow past pay disparities to follow workers from job to job.
  • I propose establishing a state Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, since Arizona currently has no state law requiring private employers to provide pregnancy accommodations or breastfeeding breaks, giving Arizona workers a state enforceable right alongside existing federal protections.
  • I propose extending Arizona's unpaid domestic violence leave protections, currently required only for employers with 50 or more employees, to smaller employers as well, so survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking at any workplace have job protected time to attend legal proceedings or seek a protective order.
  • I propose enacting a standalone Arizona hate crime statute, since Arizona currently has no specific hate crime law and only allows bias to be considered as a sentencing factor for an existing crime rather than as a distinct offense.
  • I propose requiring statewide data collection on the race and ethnicity of individuals stopped by Arizona peace officers during motor vehicle stops, building on Senate Bill 1564, so patterns of racial disparity in policing can be documented and addressed with actual evidence rather than anecdote.

Housing

A stable, affordable home is the foundation for healthy families, strong schools, and a thriving economy, and today too many Arizonans are being priced out. Arizona faced an immediate housing shortfall of 55,992 units in 2025, and at current permitting rates it would take over 119 years to close that gap. Allowing more homes to be built works: after Minneapolis reformed its zoning rules, the city increased its housing stock by 12% from 2017 to 2022 while rents grew by just 1%, compared with 14% rent growth in the rest of the state, saving Minneapolis renters an estimated $1,700 per year, while homelessness in the surrounding county dropped 12%. Pairing housing with water and sewer upgrades strengthens the whole economy, since every $1 million invested in water infrastructure generates $2.5 million in economic output and more than ten jobs. Keeping families in their homes prevents far more costly harm later, because research published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics found that an eviction order increases homelessness and hospital visits and reduces earnings and access to credit, with emergency shelter use rising more than 300 percent in the year after an eviction. Permanent supportive housing has a proven record, especially for those who served our country: the number of veterans experiencing homelessness has dropped 55.6% since 2010, driven by programs that pair housing with support services. Families deserve a fair shot at buying a home, particularly in the Phoenix area, where the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that the number of homes owned by the nation's largest corporate investors, those holding 5,000 or more homes nationwide, nearly tripled between 2018 and 2024, reaching around 30,000 homes. When we build more homes, keep families housed, and give first time buyers a fair chance, we lower costs for everyone, strengthen our communities, and make sure the next generation can afford to call Arizona home.

  • I propose two things regarding Arizona's Missing Middle Housing law, codified at Arizona Revised Statutes Section 9-462.13. First, I would block House Bill 2375, a bill currently in the Legislature that would let cities exempt their historic districts from the law. The law as passed requires larger cities to allow duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and townhomes on lots within one mile of their downtown cores, and House Bill 2375 would let cities carve out exceptions to that requirement, which in Phoenix alone would remove 38 percent of the area currently covered. Second, I would go further than the current law and expand middle housing to entire cities, not just the one mile downtown zone, following the example of Flagstaff and Tucson, which chose to allow duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and townhomes citywide rather than limiting the policy to a small downtown area. Together, these two steps would keep the existing law fully intact and then build on it, so more neighborhoods across each city share in solving the housing shortage instead of concentrating new housing in just one small area.
  • I propose restoring Arizona's state Low Income Housing Tax Credit to its full original scope. This tax credit helped make affordable housing projects financially possible for developers, but it expired at the end of 2025, and the only replacement currently moving through the Legislature, House Bill 2804, would apply only to rural Arizona. I would bring back the full statewide version so affordable housing projects in both rural and urban areas have the financial support needed to get built.
  • I propose creating a state investment fund that pairs money for building affordable and workforce housing with money for upgrading local water and sewer systems. In many growing parts of Maricopa and Yuma counties, land may be available and zoning may even allow new housing, but the water and sewer infrastructure was built for a smaller population decades ago and cannot support new homes without upgrades. This proposal is modeled on a Montana law, House Bill 819, that funded both housing construction and water and sewer improvements together, and it connects directly to my water security platform by making sure infrastructure capacity does not quietly block new housing from being built.
  • I propose turning Arizona's current rental assistance pilot program, House Bill 2682, into a permanent, better funded statewide program. That bill currently helps a limited number of families who fall behind on rent avoid eviction, but housing advocates have said the funding covers only a small fraction of the need. I would expand this into an ongoing program so more Arizona families facing a temporary financial hardship can stay in their homes instead of being evicted.
  • I propose expanding permanent supportive housing for people experiencing chronic homelessness, including older veterans. Permanent supportive housing combines a stable place to live with services such as healthcare and case management, and it has been one of the most effective tools nationally for reducing homelessness among veterans over the past decade. I would help Arizona counties access and match the federal funding already available for this purpose through the McKinney Vento Homeless Assistance Act and Department of Veterans Affairs housing programs, so more of that federal money reaches Arizona communities.
  • I propose requiring that cities and counties receiving state money to address homelessness also show they are removing local barriers to building more housing. Spending money on shelters and services without allowing more housing to be built treats the symptoms of the housing shortage without addressing what is causing it. This approach follows a requirement California now uses, and it would ensure that Arizona's homelessness funding goes hand in hand with real progress on housing supply, rather than being spent while local zoning rules continue making the shortage worse.
  • I propose limiting the number of single family homes, condominiums, and townhouses that a corporation or business operating in Arizona can own, and requiring that any such property stay listed on the open market for at least one year before a corporation can buy it. Large investors buying up homes can make it harder for individual families to compete for a limited supply of houses, particularly starter homes. This builds on House Bill 2325, a bill currently in the Arizona Legislature that would cap institutional investor ownership at 50 single family homes statewide and block investor bids during a home's first 60 days on the market. My proposal would go further, with a full one year waiting period before a corporation could purchase a residential property.

Child Care & Working Families

Affordable, reliable child care is not only a family issue; it is an economic issue that affects every employer, taxpayer, and community in our state. A 2026 ReadyNation report found that Arizona loses about $3.3 billion a year in productivity, earnings and tax revenue because of child care challenges, and the organization's earlier Arizona study found that productivity problems caused Arizona employers to lose $958 million annually while taxpayers lost $725 million each year in lower tax revenue. Working parents feel this every day: more than half of Arizona parents surveyed reported being late for work, leaving early, missing full days of work or being distracted at work due to child care struggles, one in three said they had been reprimanded, and 19 percent had been let go or fired. The cost is a heavy burden on families, since infant care in Arizona averages $14,040 a year, more than in state college tuition. Help for families who need it most is also falling short, because 88% of Arizona children who are income eligible for child care assistance have no access to it due to insufficient funding, and in 2024 the state reinstated a waiting list that had taken a decade to eliminate. When businesses invest in child care, when zoning allows centers to open where families live and work, and when Arizona uses every available dollar to help working parents, employers gain a more reliable workforce, parents can stay on the job, and children receive the nurturing start they need to succeed.

  • Require or incentivize large employers to provide child care benefits or contribute to a shared child care fund, so that corporate Arizona steps up for its workforce.
  • Create tax incentives for businesses that offer on-site child care or subsidize employee child care costs, putting the private sector to work for working families.
  • Eliminate zoning restrictions that prevent child care facilities from opening in the neighborhoods where families actually live and work.
  • Demand that Arizona fully utilize its Child Care and Development Block Grant allocation. Our state has left federal child care dollars on the table for too long while families go without.

Infrastructure

LD25 is growing faster than the roads, water systems, and connections that serve it. Too often the story has been a cycle of promises and delays: highway money deferred, dedicated funds swept into the general fund, and water security dollars used to patch budget holes. I believe state government has a basic duty to fund the infrastructure it has already promised and to finish projects on schedule. These proposals reflect how I work every day: carefully, transparently, and with the people most affected in mind. Senator Tim Dunn has served in the Legislature since 2018, first in the House from February 2018 and in the Senate since January 13, 2025. During those years, the state deferred the I-10 widening money, swept water security funds, and moved highway dollars into the general fund. I am running because LD25 deserves new ideas and a representative who treats a funded project as a promise to keep.

  • I will work to protect every remaining dollar scheduled to widen I-10 between SR 85 and Citrus Road, oppose any further deferral, and press for regular public progress reports from ADOT so residents can see exactly where the project stands. More than 140,000 vehicles travel this stretch each day, a nearly 40% increase in just two years, and between 2021 and 2025, 1,145 crashes were reported between Citrus Road and Verrado Way. A solution has already been designed: a High Occupancy Vehicle travel lane, a concrete median barrier and median lighting, and a widened westbound I-10 bridge over Citrus Road. The funding history, however, has been a cycle of promises and delays. The FY 2023 budget appropriated $64,200,000 from the State Highway Fund, but the FY 2025 budget deferred $108,000,000 in accumulated highway funding, including FY 2023 appropriations, to FY 2027 and FY 2028. Meanwhile, construction costs rose, and the total project cost is now estimated at $146 million. Earlier this year, a proposed budget from Governor Hobbs' office would have deferred the $27 million allocated for the first phase of construction to an unknown date. The enacted FY 2027 budget ultimately kept $30,000,000 in FY 2027 and $76,000,000 in FY 2028 for the widening.
  • I will work to keep state commitments to Buckeye's connecting corridors on schedule and to coordinate state funding with city and regional partners so that construction phases align and residents face fewer years of disruption. At the I-10 and Jackrabbit Trail interchange, ADOT is reconstructing the existing interchange, adding traffic signals, and widening Jackrabbit Trail to three lanes in each direction, with construction scheduled to begin in early August 2026 and take approximately two years. State Route 30, a new freeway planned in the southwest valley crossing Buckeye, Goodyear, Avondale and Phoenix, is slated to begin construction in summer 2027 and end in summer 2030.
  • I will advocate for a predictable, formula-based share of state transportation dollars for rural counties, so that rural road safety does not depend on which lawmakers win a slice of a given year's budget negotiations. Rural roads carry farm products, school buses, and emergency vehicles, and they deserve the same attention as metro freeways. Recent state budgets have included projects such as $33,300,000 to improve U.S. Route 95 between Wellton Mohawk Canal Road and Aberdeen Road, and $1,300,000 for Yuma County's bridge replacement project on Somerton Avenue between West County 10th Street and West County 11th Street.
  • I will fight to restore the rural water supply funds, to place statutory protections on the Long Term Water Augmentation Fund so it cannot be used as a budget reserve, and to prioritize projects that serve both agricultural and municipal users.
  • I will push for public, location-level progress reports on broadband construction in LD25 and for the state to pursue every eligible dollar of its full allocation. Telehealth, remote work, online school, and modern farming all depend on a reliable internet connection. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce that serves as the executive branch's principal voice on telecommunications and internet policy, approved Arizona's final plan to bring fiber technology to 118,170 locations at a deployment cost of $446,123,359, out of $993,112,231 in total BEAD funding allocated to the state, with construction anticipated to begin in early 2026. As someone who has run a telehealth practice for years, I know how much a strong connection matters.
  • I will support state cost-share funding that helps local flood control districts win federal grants, and I will ask that new development approvals account for existing drainage plans. Desert communities flood, and rapid development changes how water moves across the land. The Flood Control District's Sun Valley drainage plan alone covers approximately 183 square miles in Buckeye and unincorporated Maricopa County, bounded generally by Gates Road on the north, the White Tank Mountains on the east, Interstate 10 on the south, and the Hassayampa River on the west. The District's capital budget for new structures and major repairs varies from year to year and depends on the availability of funds, grants, and cost share, while the Arizona Department of Water Resources leads on floodplain management and dam safety.

Sexual Assault Prevention & Survivor Protection

Sexual violence is one of the most underreported and under-prosecuted crimes in America and Arizona is no exception. In 2024, only 24% of rape or sexual assault victimizations were reported to police, a dramatic drop from the year before. Among female college students, only 20% report sexual assault to law enforcement. The reasons are consistent and well documented: 20% of survivors fear retaliation, 13% believe police will not do anything to help, and 13% consider it a personal matter. Meanwhile, between 90% and 98% of sexual assault reports are true, yet survivors are routinely treated as suspects rather than victims. Just 20% of female victims report to law enforcement, and the result is that the vast majority of perpetrators face no consequences at all. Cases like the Cornell 7, in which seven fraternity members were accused of drugging and gang raping a fellow student, make clear that our systems are failing survivors at every level. Arizona must do better. I will champion a comprehensive Arizona Survivors' Rights Act and the following legislative protections:

Making It Safer to Report

  • Create a statewide anonymous sexual assault reporting portal allowing survivors to report without triggering an automatic investigation, giving them full control over if and when law enforcement becomes involved.
  • Establish third party reporting options at universities, hospitals, and community organizations where an advocate can file a report on a survivor's behalf without the survivor being identified.
  • Mandate that all Arizona law enforcement agencies and universities offer anonymous or confidential reporting pathways as an alternative to formal reporting, and that survivors are informed of these options at every point of contact.
  • Create a Jane Doe evidence preservation system allowing survivors to have a rape kit completed and evidence preserved anonymously without committing to a formal report, keeping their options open without forcing an immediate decision.
  • Ensure anonymous reports can still be used to identify patterns of behavior by repeat perpetrators without exposing the survivor's identity.
  • Prohibit Arizona law enforcement from automatically converting an anonymous report into a formal investigation without the survivor's explicit consent.

Protecting Survivors from Being Put on Trial

  • Strengthen and modernize Arizona's rape shield law to explicitly prohibit the introduction of a survivor's sexual history, clothing, alcohol or drug use, or prior relationship with the accused as evidence of consent or wrongdoing in both criminal and civil proceedings.
  • Extend rape shield protections to civil lawsuits, as currently Arizona's shield law applies primarily in criminal proceedings, leaving survivors vulnerable when they pursue civil accountability.
  • Create explicit anti retaliation protections making it a civil violation for any person, institution, or organization to take adverse action against someone for reporting sexual assault in good faith.
  • Protect survivors from bad faith counter suits by strengthening Arizona's anti SLAPP statute to cover retaliatory legal actions arising from sexual assault reports, allowing survivors to have such suits dismissed quickly and recover attorney's fees.
  • Prohibit a survivor's social media and digital communications from being subpoenaed or used as evidence without a high evidentiary threshold and judicial review.
  • Prohibit cross examination tactics designed to humiliate or discredit survivors rather than challenge specific factual claims.
  • Prohibit charging survivors with false reporting unless there is clear and convincing evidence of deliberate fabrication, as the actual rate of confirmed false reports is approximately 5%, yet the threat of being charged deters countless survivors from coming forward.
  • Mandate trauma informed training for all Arizona judges, attorneys, and law enforcement handling sexual assault cases, including understanding why survivors may have inconsistent memories, delayed reporting, or continued contact with their abuser.
  • Require that survivors be informed of all their rights in writing at the first point of contact with law enforcement, universities, or medical providers.

University & Institutional Accountability

  • Require Arizona public universities and community colleges to publicly report all sexual assault allegations, investigations, and disciplinary outcomes in a standardized format beyond minimal federal Title IX requirements.
  • Mandate that institutional disciplinary outcomes for sexual assault cannot consist solely of essays, workshops, or written assignments when credible evidence of assault exists.
  • Create civil liability for Arizona institutions that demonstrably fail to respond appropriately to credible sexual assault allegations.
  • Require an independent third party review process for how Arizona universities handle sexual assault cases.
  • Require Greek organizations at Arizona public universities to adopt binding conduct codes with real enforcement mechanisms as a condition of operating on campus.

Closing Legal Gaps

  • Review and strengthen Arizona's definition of consent to ensure that incapacitation due to alcohol or drugs, regardless of whether the victim voluntarily consumed them, cannot be used as a legal shield by perpetrators.
  • Establish clear statutory authority and guidance for Arizona prosecutors to pursue criminal charges even when a civil lawsuit is the primary vehicle for a survivor seeking accountability.
  • Strengthen evidence preservation requirements so that delayed criminal investigations are not hampered by lost or destroyed evidence.

As a licensed mental health counselor who has sat with survivors of trauma for over 16 years, I know that what happens after an assault can be just as damaging as the assault itself. Survivors deserve a system that believes them, protects them, and fights for them. That is exactly what I will do in the Arizona State Senate.

Citations